How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Pace vs OpenMove

JBL Endurance Pace vs Shokz OpenMove

What Endurance Pace does better (3) and where OpenMove wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Pace
JBL · 2025Endurance Pace
5.6Score
3 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Shokz OpenMove
Shokz · 2020OpenMove
3.9Score
2 advantages≈ $75
4.7Battery2.2
7.0Build & features6.2

Why is Endurance Pace better than OpenMove?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 6 h+67%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
  3. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5+8%

Why is OpenMove better than Endurance Pace?

  1. Charging time4 h vs 2 h2×
  2. Weight33 g vs 29 g+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Shokz OpenMoveShokz OpenMove≈ $753.9
Sound
FitOpen-earBone conduction
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size18 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity104 dB96 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Microphones22
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h6 h
Charging time4 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight33 g29 g
Protection rating—IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Colours—Grey, Blue, White, Pink
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare