How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Charge 6 vs ULT FIELD 3

JBL Charge 6 vs Sony ULT FIELD 3

What Charge 6 does better (3) and where ULT FIELD 3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL Charge 6
JBL · 2025Charge 6
6.6Score
3 advantages≈ $140
vs
Sony ULT FIELD 3
Sony · 2025ULT FIELD 3
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
6.0Sound6.1
7.6Battery7.9
3.4Build & features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Charge 6ULT FIELD 3
228.8 × 98.594256 × 11379
Charge 6ULT FIELD 3Difference
Height98.5 mm113 mm−14.5 mm
Width228.8 mm256 mm−27.2 mm
Depth94 mm79 mm+15 mm
Weight1,370 g1,200 g+170 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Charge 6 better than ULT FIELD 3?

  1. Output power45 W vs 30 W+50%
  2. Battery life28 h vs 24 h+17%
  3. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%

Why is ULT FIELD 3 better than Charge 6?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
  2. Lowest frequency56 Hz vs 20 Hz2.8×
  3. Weight1,370 g vs 1,200 g+14%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Charge 6JBL Charge 6≈ $1406.6
Sony ULT FIELD 3Sony ULT FIELD 3≈ $1108.2
Sound
Output power45 W30 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency56 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life28 h24 h
Battery capacity4,722 mAh—
Charging time3 h—
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 2,5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Power bank functionYesYes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.2
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
AuracastYes—
USB-CYesYes
USB audioYes—
Design & build
Weight1,370 g1,200 g
Width229 mm256 mm
Height98 mm113 mm
Depth94 mm79 mm
Protection ratingIP68IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
Party / stereo pairingYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare