vs
6.0Sound5.1
7.6Battery9.6
3.4Build & features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Charge 6Emberton III
| Charge 6 | Emberton III | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 98.5 mm | 68 mm | +30.5 mm |
| Width | 228.8 mm | 160 mm | +68.8 mm |
| Depth | 94 mm | 76.9 mm | +17.1 mm |
| Weight | 1,370 g | 670 g | +700 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Charge 6 better than Emberton III?
- Output power45 W vs 38 W+18%
- Lowest frequency56 Hz vs 65 Hz+16%
Why is Emberton III better than Charge 6?
- Weight1,370 g vs 670 g2×
- Battery life28 h vs 32 h+14%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
- Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 50.8 mm |
| Output power | 45 W | 38 W |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Channel count | 2 | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 56 Hz | 65 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 28 h | 32 h |
| Battery capacity | 4,722 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 2,5 h | 20 min → 6 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Mains powered | No | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| Auracast | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,370 g | 670 g |
| Width | 229 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 98 mm | 68 mm |
| Depth | 94 mm | 77 mm |
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | Yes | — |
