How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Charge 5 Wi-Fi vs Moto Sound Flow

JBL Charge 5 Wi-Fi vs Motorola Moto Sound Flow

What Charge 5 Wi-Fi does better (3) and where Moto Sound Flow wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Charge 5 Wi-Fi
JBL · 2023Charge 5 Wi-Fi
7.2Score
3 advantages≈ $140
vs
Motorola Moto Sound Flow
Motorola · 2026Moto Sound Flow
9.5Score
1 advantage≈ $110
Higher score
5.9Battery5.4
7.2Build & features9.0

Why is Charge 5 Wi-Fi better than Moto Sound Flow?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 15 h+33%
  2. Output power40 W vs 30 W+33%
  3. Battery capacity7,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+25%

Why is Moto Sound Flow better than Charge 5 Wi-Fi?

  1. Weight1,000 g vs 581 g+72%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power40 W30 W
Lowest frequency60 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h15 h
Battery capacity7,500 mAh6,000 mAh
Charging time6 h—
Power bank functionYes—
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast / Google CastYes—
Spotify ConnectYes—
Voice assistant built in—Yes
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight1,000 g581 g
Width223 mm—
Height97 mm—
Depth94 mm—
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairingYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare