How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Charge 5 vs Emberton III

JBL Charge 5 vs Marshall Emberton III

What Charge 5 does better (1) and where Emberton III wins (4) — every spec side by side.

JBL Charge 5
JBL · 2021Charge 5
7.5Score
1 advantage≈ $130
vs
Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $140
Higher score
5.2Sound5.1
7.0Battery9.6
5.7Build & features8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Charge 5Emberton III
223 × 96.594160 × 6876.9
Charge 5Emberton IIIDifference
Height96.5 mm68 mm+28.5 mm
Width223 mm160 mm+63 mm
Depth94 mm76.9 mm+17.1 mm
Weight960 g670 g+290 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Charge 5 better than Emberton III?

  1. Output power40 W vs 38 W+5%

Why is Emberton III better than Charge 5?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 32 h+60%
  2. Weight960 g vs 670 g+43%
  3. Charging time4 h vs 2 h2×
  4. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Charge 5JBL Charge 5≈ $1307.5
Sound
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—50.8 mm
Output power40 W38 W
Speaker channelsMono2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency65 Hz65 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h32 h
Battery capacity7,500 mAh—
Charging time4 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—20 min → 6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Power bank functionYes—
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight960 g670 g
Width223 mm160 mm
Height96 mm68 mm
Depth94 mm77 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairingYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare