Dimensions
Size comparison
BandBox TrioTUK
| BandBox Trio | TUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 265 mm | 276 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 344 mm | 178 mm | +166 mm |
| Depth | 228 mm | 215 mm | +13 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BandBox Trio better than TUK?
- Output power135 W vs 130 W+4%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 4.2+29%
Why is TUK better than BandBox Trio?
TUK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 135 W | 130 W |
| Speaker channels | — | 2.0 |
| Channel count | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Mains powered | — | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX HD, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 5,000 g |
| Width | 344 mm | 178 mm |
| Height | 265 mm | 276 mm |
| Depth | 228 mm | 215 mm |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | — | Yes |
