How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. 4305P vs SC-CX700E

JBL 4305P vs Technics SC-CX700E

What 4305P does better (1) and where SC-CX700E wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL 4305P
JBL · 20224305P
7.3Score
1 advantage≈ $1,400
Higher score
vs
Technics SC-CX700E
Technics · 2024SC-CX700E
1 advantage≈ $2,300
6.2Connectivity5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

4305PSC-CX700E
210 × 336223.3201 × 313276
4305PSC-CX700EDifference
Height336 mm313 mm+23 mm
Width210 mm201 mm+9 mm
Depth223.3 mm276 mm−52.7 mm
Weight6,600 g9,100 g−2,500 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 4305P better than SC-CX700E?

  1. Weight6,600 g vs 9,100 g+38%

Why is SC-CX700E better than 4305P?

  1. Output power150 W vs 200 W+33%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL 4305PJBL 4305P≈ $1,4007.3
Sound
Output power150 W200 W
Lowest frequency45 Hz—
Highest frequency25,000 Hz—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.1—
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-C—Yes
USB audioYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYesYes
Ethernet—Yes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlayYesYes
Chromecast / Google CastYesYes
Spotify ConnectYesYes
Design & build
Weight6,600 g9,100 g
Width210 mm201 mm
Height336 mm313 mm
Depth223 mm276 mm
Features
Remote control—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare