How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. 4305P vs Coda W

JBL 4305P vs KEF Coda W

What 4305P does better (2) and where Coda W wins (5) — every spec side by side.

JBL 4305P
JBL · 20224305P
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $1,400
Higher score
vs
KEF Coda W
KEF · 2025Coda W
5 advantages≈ $970
6.7Sound7.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

4305PCoda W
210 × 336223.3168 × 285268
4305PCoda WDifference
Height336 mm285 mm+51 mm
Width210 mm168 mm+42 mm
Depth223.3 mm268 mm−44.7 mm
Weight6,600 g11,300 g−4,700 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 4305P better than Coda W?

  1. Weight6,600 g vs 11,300 g+71%
  2. Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+25%

Why is Coda W better than 4305P?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · 4305P: Yes
  2. Output power150 W vs 200 W+33%
  3. aptXNo · 4305P: Yes
  4. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.4+6%
  5. Lowest frequency45 Hz vs 38 Hz+18%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL 4305PJBL 4305P≈ $1,4006.7
KEF Coda WKEF Coda W≈ $970
Sound
Output power150 W200 W
Speaker channels—2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency45 Hz38 Hz
Highest frequency25,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.4
Bluetooth codecsSBCaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoYes
LDACNoNo
USB audioYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast / Google CastYes—
Spotify ConnectYes—
Design & build
Weight6,600 g11,300 g
Width210 mm168 mm
Height336 mm285 mm
Depth223 mm268 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare