vs
3.1Noise control & calls5.4
2.2Battery6.1
Why is ITW-4000-2 better than Buds T200 Lite?
ITW-4000-2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Buds T200 Lite better than ITW-4000-2?
- Active noise cancellingNo · ITW-4000-2: Yes
- Battery life4 h vs 7 h+75%
- Total with charging case16 h vs 48 h3×
- Driver size10 mm vs 12.4 mm+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 16 h | 48 h |
| Charging time | 1.8 h | — |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
