How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BTH20 vs TAK4200

iClever BTH20 vs Philips TAK4200

What BTH20 does better (4) and where TAK4200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

iClever BTH20
iClever · 2026BTH20
8.4Score
4 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $30
9.2Noise control & calls6.0
6.1Battery5.6

Why is BTH20 better than TAK4200?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAK4200: No
  2. Battery life60 h vs 45 h+33%
  3. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 300 mAh+67%
  4. Driver size40 mm vs 32 mm+25%

Why is TAK4200 better than BTH20?

  1. Weight220 g vs 129 g+71%
Specifications

Side by side

iClever BTH20iClever BTH20≈ $358.4
Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $304.7
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm32 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity80 dB85 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life60 h45 h
Battery life with ANC35 h—
Battery capacity500 mAh300 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight220 g129 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare