How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BTH20 vs ARTICA TEMPEST

iClever BTH20 vs NGS ARTICA TEMPEST

What BTH20 does better (1) and where ARTICA TEMPEST wins (2) — every spec side by side.

iClever BTH20
iClever · 2026BTH20
8.4Score
1 advantage≈ $35
Higher score
vs
NGS ARTICA TEMPEST
NGS · 2026ARTICA TEMPEST
7.9Score
2 advantages≈ $30
9.2Noise control & calls4.0
6.2Battery8.6

Why is BTH20 better than ARTICA TEMPEST?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · ARTICA TEMPEST: No

Why is ARTICA TEMPEST better than BTH20?

  1. Battery life60 h vs 80 h+33%
  2. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 600 mAh+20%
Specifications

Side by side

iClever BTH20iClever BTH20≈ $358.4
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Sensitivity80 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life60 h80 h
Battery life with ANC35 h—
Battery capacity500 mAh600 mAh
Charging time—2.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.4—
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight220 g—
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare