How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BTH12 vs Tune 520BT

iClever BTH12 vs JBL Tune 520BT

What BTH12 does better (1) and where Tune 520BT wins (2) — every spec side by side.

iClever BTH12
iClever · 2022BTH12
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $30
vs
JBL Tune 520BT
JBL · 2023Tune 520BT
4.9Score
2 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
5.8Battery7.1

Why is BTH12 better than Tune 520BT?

  1. Driver size40 mm vs 33 mm+21%

Why is Tune 520BT better than BTH12?

  1. Battery life40 h vs 57 h+43%
  2. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications

Side by side

iClever BTH12iClever BTH12≈ $304.4
JBL Tune 520BTJBL Tune 520BT≈ $304.9
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm33 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—30 Ω
Sensitivity—102 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life40 h57 h
Battery capacity800 mAh—
Charging time—2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4 h5 min → 1 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.3
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight—157 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare