How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. FreeBuds SE 3 vs TAT2139

Huawei FreeBuds SE 3 vs Philips TAT2139

What FreeBuds SE 3 does better (3) and where TAT2139 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Huawei FreeBuds SE 3
Huawei · 2025FreeBuds SE 3
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
Philips TAT2139
Philips · 2024TAT2139
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
9.3Noise control & calls9.3
7.3Battery4.2

Why is FreeBuds SE 3 better than TAT2139?

  1. Battery life9 h vs 7 h+29%
  2. Total with charging case42 h vs 28 h+50%
  3. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×

Why is TAT2139 better than FreeBuds SE 3?

  1. Driver size10 mm vs 13 mm+30%
  2. Battery capacity41 mAh vs 50 mAh+22%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2139Philips TAT2139≈ $256.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—94 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h7 h
Total with charging case42 h28 h
Battery capacity41 mAh50 mAh
Charging time1 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 3 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)3.8 g—
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare