How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. W64 vs TAK4200

Hoco W64 vs Philips TAK4200

What W64 does better (0) and where TAK4200 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Hoco W64
Hoco · 2026W64
0 advantages≈ $16
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.7Score
0 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls6.0

Why is W64 better than TAK4200?

W64 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAK4200 better than W64?

TAK4200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Hoco W64Hoco W64≈ $16
Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $304.7
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size32 mm32 mm
Number of drivers11
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—85 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Battery capacity300 mAh300 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—129 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare