Why is W64 better than TAH2000?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 200 mAh+50%
Why is TAH2000 better than W64?
- Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 123 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 26 h |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 15 min → 6 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
