Why is W64 better than Tune 520C?
W64 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Tune 520C better than W64?
- Driver size32 mm vs 33 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 33 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 30 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 102 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 157 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
