Why is Deva Pro better than HDJ-CX?
Deva Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HDJ-CX better than Deva Pro?
- Weight360 g vs 136 g2.6×
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 30,000 Hz+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Planar magnetic | Dynamic |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 30,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 18 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 94 dB | 103 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 360 g | 136 g |
| Colours | Beige, Silver | Black |
