How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Bone vs WF-1000XM6

Head Bone vs Sony WF-1000XM6

What Bone does better (2) and where WF-1000XM6 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Head Bone
Head · 2025Bone
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
vs
Sony WF-1000XM6
Sony · 2026WF-1000XM6
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $250
5.3Battery6.5
9.1Build & features3.1

Why is Bone better than WF-1000XM6?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. Weight32 g vs 47 g+47%

Why is WF-1000XM6 better than Bone?

  1. Battery life11 h vs 12 h+9%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Head BoneHead Bone≈ $1309.2
Sony WF-1000XM6Sony WF-1000XM6≈ $2505.0
Sound
FitNeckbandBone conduction
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—8.4 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance80 Ω—
Sensitivity86 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life11 h12 h
Battery life with ANC—8 h
Battery capacity150 mAh—
Charging time2 h1.5 h
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Siri—
Design & build
Weight32 g47 g
Earbud weight (each)—6.5 g
Protection ratingIPX8IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare