vs
6.4Sound8.5
4.0Battery7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Onyx Studio 9ULT FIELD 5
| Onyx Studio 9 | ULT FIELD 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 387.5 mm | 144 mm | +243.5 mm |
| Width | 389.2 mm | 320 mm | +69.2 mm |
| Depth | 130 mm | 125 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 3,300 g | 3,300 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Onyx Studio 9 better than ULT FIELD 5?
Onyx Studio 9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is ULT FIELD 5 better than Onyx Studio 9?
- Battery life8 h vs 25 h3.1×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Onyx Studio 9: Yes
- Lowest frequency50 Hz vs 20 Hz2.5×
- LDACNo · Onyx Studio 9: Yes
- Charging time4 h vs 3.5 h+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | 2.0 |
| Channel count | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 50 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 25 h |
| Battery capacity | 4,722 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 4 h | 3.5 h |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Mains powered | No | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| Auracast | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 3,300 g | 3,300 g |
| Width | 389 mm | 320 mm |
| Height | 388 mm | 144 mm |
| Depth | 130 mm | 125 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
| Party / stereo pairing | Yes | Yes |
| Light effects | — | Yes |
