vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
GoMonitor Reference 2A
| Go | Monitor Reference 2A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 240 mm | 290 mm | −50 mm |
| Width | 439 mm | 175 mm | +264 mm |
| Depth | 192 mm | 205 mm | −13 mm |
| Weight | 4,700 g | 4,400 g | +300 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Go better than Monitor Reference 2A?
Go has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Monitor Reference 2A better than Go?
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- aptXNo · Go: Yes
- Weight4,700 g vs 4,400 g+7%
- Lowest frequency43 Hz vs 38 Hz+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 160 W | — |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Channel count | 2 | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 43 Hz | 38 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Mains powered | Yes | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | aptX, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 4,700 g | 4,400 g |
| Width | 439 mm | 175 mm |
| Height | 240 mm | 290 mm |
| Depth | 192 mm | 205 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
