Why is JOY better than HA-EC25T?
- Driver size14.2 mm vs 6 mm2.4×
- Earbud weight (each)3.2 g vs 6.9 g2.2×
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is HA-EC25T better than JOY?
- Battery life4 h vs 7 h+75%
- Total with charging case12 h vs 30 h2.5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 14.2 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 126 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 12 h | 30 h |
| Battery capacity | 35 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.2 g | 6.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Colours | Purple | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
