vs
3.1Noise control & calls5.5
Why is TWS 4G Metal Logo headphones better than TAT2520?
TWS 4G Metal Logo headphones has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAT2520 better than TWS 4G Metal Logo headphones?
- Active noise cancellingNo · TWS 4G Metal Logo headphones: Yes
- Charging time7 h vs 2 h3.5×
- Battery capacity30 mAh vs 40 mAh+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 4 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 14 h |
| Battery capacity | 30 mAh | 40 mAh |
| Charging time | 7 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | White | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
