vs
Why is 75W Compact Bluetooth Soundbar better than Solo B30 2.1?
- Channel count3 vs 2.1+43%
Why is Solo B30 2.1 better than 75W Compact Bluetooth Soundbar?
- SubwooferNone vs Wireless subwoofer included
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | — | 120 W |
| Speaker channels | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Channel count | 3 | 2.1 |
| Subwoofer | None | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Lowest frequency | — | 70 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 18,000 Hz |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 1,850 g |
| Width | — | 400 mm |
| Height | — | 108 mm |
| Depth | — | 66 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Placement | — | unter dem Fernseher, an der Wand |
Related comparisons
vs
Groov-e 75W Compact Bluetooth SoundbarvsSamsung HW-Q810GD/ZG
vs
Groov-e 75W Compact Bluetooth SoundbarvsSamsung Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos
vs
ULTIMEA Apollo S60vsGroov-e 75W Compact Bluetooth Soundbar
vs
Groov-e 75W Compact Bluetooth SoundbarvsULTIMEA Aura A30
vs
ULTIMEA Solo B30 2.1vsAlphatronics Clear Sound 400
vs
Samsung HW-QS750F/ZFvsULTIMEA Solo B30 2.1
