How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Twins Rush vs CMF Buds 2

Fresh 'n Rebel Twins Rush vs Nothing CMF Buds 2

What Twins Rush does better (1) and where CMF Buds 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Fresh 'n Rebel Twins Rush
Fresh 'n Rebel · 2025Twins Rush
8.4Score
1 advantage≈ $45
vs
Nothing CMF Buds 2
Nothing · 2025CMF Buds 2
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls5.1
7.0Battery9.4

Why is Twins Rush better than CMF Buds 2?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%

Why is CMF Buds 2 better than Twins Rush?

  1. Battery life with ANC8 h vs 32 h4×
  2. Battery life9 h vs 13 h+44%
  3. Total with charging case38 h vs 55 h+45%
  4. Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—11 mm
Sensitivity—48 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h13 h
Battery life with ANC8 h32 h
Total with charging case38 h55 h
Battery capacity—53 mAh
Charging time2 h1.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—4.5 g
Protection ratingIP57IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare