vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
7.0Battery9.0
Why is Twins Rush better than xboom Buds Lite by will.i.am?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
Why is xboom Buds Lite by will.i.am better than Twins Rush?
- Battery life9 h vs 11 h+22%
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
- Total with charging case38 h vs 45 h+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 11 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 8 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 38 h | 45 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 5 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 41 g |
| Protection rating | IP57 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
