vs
9.3Noise control & calls9.3
Why is Twins Blaze better than TAT3000?
- Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×
Why is TAT3000 better than Twins Blaze?
TAT3000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Sensitivity | — | 106 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 32 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 6 |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
