vs
9.2Noise control & calls4.0
7.0Battery9.3
Why is Clam Junior better than Studio Wireless C?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Studio Wireless C: No
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is Studio Wireless C better than Clam Junior?
- Battery life60 h vs 110 h+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 50 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 85 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 60 h | 110 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
