vs
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
8.8Battery9.3
Why is Clam Blaze better than Studio Wireless C?
Clam Blaze has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Studio Wireless C better than Clam Blaze?
- Battery life80 h vs 110 h+38%
- Driver size40 mm vs 50 mm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 50 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 80 h | 110 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 3 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.2 |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
