vs
9.0Battery9.2
Why is Clam Blaze better than TUNE 530BT?
- Battery life80 h vs 76 h+5%
- Driver size40 mm vs 33 mm+21%
Why is TUNE 530BT better than Clam Blaze?
TUNE 530BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 33 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 30 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 102 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 80 h | 76 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 3 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 152 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
