How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ZE500 for ASMR vs TAA6709BK/00

final ZE500 for ASMR vs Philips TAA6709BK/00

What ZE500 for ASMR does better (0) and where TAA6709BK/00 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

final ZE500 for ASMR
final · 2025ZE500 for ASMR
0 advantages≈ $50
vs
Philips TAA6709BK/00
Philips · 2025TAA6709BK/00
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
3.2Battery4.4

Why is ZE500 for ASMR better than TAA6709BK/00?

ZE500 for ASMR has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAA6709BK/00 better than ZE500 for ASMR?

  1. Battery life4.5 h vs 7 h+56%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency—150 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—91 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life4.5 h7 h
Total with charging case—28 h
Battery capacity—58 mAh
Charging time1.5 h—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Colours—Black, Red
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare