vs
7.2Noise control & calls5.4
3.4Battery4.5
6.3Build & features3.5
Why is ZE300 for ASMR 3D better than Accentum Open?
- Earbud weight (each)4 g vs 8.7 g2.2×
Why is Accentum Open better than ZE300 for ASMR 3D?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 6 h+9%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 25 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 15,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 109 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 28 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | 8.7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | — | Cream, Black, Blush |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Wear detection (auto pause) | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Rick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervsfinal ZE300 for ASMR 3D
vsSoundcore R50i NCvsfinal ZE300 for ASMR 3D
vsRealme BUDS CLIPvsfinal ZE300 for ASMR 3D5.75.7
vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbudsvsfinal ZE300 for ASMR 3D
vs
Sennheiser Accentum Openvsfinal ZE500 for ASMRvs
Sennheiser Accentum OpenvsJLab Flex Open Earbuds5.25.2