How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. UX3000 vs TAPH805BK/10

final UX3000 vs Philips TAPH805BK/10

What UX3000 does better (2) and where TAPH805BK/10 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

final UX3000
final · 2023UX3000
7.4Score
2 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
vs
Philips TAPH805BK/10
Philips · 2020TAPH805BK/10
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $100
9.2Noise control & calls7.8
4.8Battery4.0

Why is UX3000 better than TAPH805BK/10?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 30 h+17%
  2. aptXYes · TAPH805BK/10: No

Why is TAPH805BK/10 better than UX3000?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

final UX3000final UX3000≈ $907.4
Sound
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—90 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h30 h
Battery life with ANC—30 h
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsaptX, AAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare