Why is UX3000 better than HA-S99N?
- aptXYes · HA-S99N: No
- Charging time2.5 h vs 3 h+20%
Why is HA-S99N better than UX3000?
- Battery life35 h vs 50 h+43%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 36 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 35 h | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 35 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 195 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
