How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. UX2000 vs NiceComfort 35

final UX2000 vs Srhythm NiceComfort 35

What UX2000 does better (2) and where NiceComfort 35 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

final UX2000
final · 2023UX2000
8.9Score
2 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Srhythm NiceComfort 35
Srhythm · 2020NiceComfort 35
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ $60
9.2Noise control & calls9.2
7.1Battery5.8

Why is UX2000 better than NiceComfort 35?

  1. Battery life60 h vs 50 h+20%
  2. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%

Why is NiceComfort 35 better than UX2000?

  1. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

final UX2000final UX2000≈ $558.9
Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life60 h50 h
Battery life with ANC—30 h
Battery capacity—800 mAh
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 3 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight—180 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare