Why is UX2000 better than TAH6509?
UX2000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAH6509 better than UX2000?
- Battery life60 h vs 70 h+17%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 60 h | 70 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 45 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
