How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. KDT3000 vs OpenWear Stereo

final KDT3000 vs Xiaomi OpenWear Stereo

What KDT3000 does better (1) and where OpenWear Stereo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

final KDT3000
final · 2025KDT3000
1 advantage≈ $85
vs
Xiaomi OpenWear Stereo
Xiaomi · 2024OpenWear Stereo
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $85
Higher score
6.6Battery5.2

Why is KDT3000 better than OpenWear Stereo?

  1. Battery life8.5 h vs 7 h+21%

Why is OpenWear Stereo better than KDT3000?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · KDT3000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOpen-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backOpen-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life8.5 h7 h
Total with charging case—38 h
Charging time1.5 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLHDC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—9.6 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare