How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Snowsky Wind vs TAK4200

FiiO Snowsky Wind vs Philips TAK4200

What Snowsky Wind does better (1) and where TAK4200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

FiiO Snowsky Wind
FiiO · 2026Snowsky Wind
1 advantage≈ $30
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $35
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls5.5

Why is Snowsky Wind better than TAK4200?

  1. Driver size40 mm vs 32 mm+25%

Why is TAK4200 better than Snowsky Wind?

  1. Battery capacity80 mAh vs 300 mAh3.8×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $354.5
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designSemi-openClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm32 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity80 dB85 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Battery capacity80 mAh300 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—129 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare