vs
Why is SA1 FIO-SA1 better than Session 900?
SA1 FIO-SA1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Session 900 better than SA1 FIO-SA1?
- Output power25 W vs 50 W2×
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
- Lowest frequency65 Hz vs 50 Hz+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | — | 93 mm |
| Output power | 25 W | 50 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | — |
| Lowest frequency | 65 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 49 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 3.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Mains powered | Yes | — |
| Battery powered (portable) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| Auracast | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Optical input | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 1,050 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Colours | — | Cement, True Black, Primer |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
