vs
Why is RETRO BOX FIO-RETROBOX better than Soft Bumble Speaker?
- Output power11 W vs 5 W2.1×
- Battery life10.5 h vs 8 h+31%
Why is Soft Bumble Speaker better than RETRO BOX FIO-RETROBOX?
Soft Bumble Speaker has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 11 W | 5 W |
| Lowest frequency | 65 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10.5 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | — | 8 h |
| Mains powered | — | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Width | 99 mm | — |
| Height | 76 mm | — |
| Depth | 153 mm | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Sound PartyvsFiiO RETRO BOX FIO-RETROBOX
vs
JBL GripvsHoptimist Soft Bumble Speaker
vs
Bose SoundLink Micro Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen)vsHoptimist Soft Bumble Speaker
vs
JBL Wind 3vsHoptimist Soft Bumble Speaker
vs
PURE Classic AuravsHoptimist Soft Bumble Speaker
vs
Soundcore Boom 3ivsHoptimist Soft Bumble Speaker
