Why is JT3 better than Aonic 40?
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Driver size50 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Why is Aonic 40 better than JT3?
- Active noise cancellingNo · JT3: Yes
- Weight330 g vs 319 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 50 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 80 Ω | 31 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 25 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 330 g | 319 g |
