How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. JT3 vs RB-HJ800

FiiO JT3 vs Panasonic RB-HJ800

What JT3 does better (3) and where RB-HJ800 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

FiiO JT3
FiiO · 2025JT3
3 advantages≈ $95
vs
Panasonic RB-HJ800
Panasonic · 2026RB-HJ800
9.3Score
2 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls7.9

Why is JT3 better than RB-HJ800?

  1. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. Driver size50 mm vs 40 mm+25%

Why is RB-HJ800 better than JT3?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · JT3: Yes
  2. Weight330 g vs 260 g+27%
Specifications

Side by side

FiiO JT3FiiO JT3≈ $95
Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size50 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance80 Ω—
Sensitivity97 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—100 h
Charging time—4 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight330 g260 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare