vs
4.5Sound3.0
5.3Battery3.2
3.7Build & features2.9
Why is FW3 FIO-FW3 better than TW-E7B?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TW-E7B: No
- Battery life7 h vs 6 h+17%
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- LDACYes · TW-E7B: No
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 7.3 g+22%
Why is TW-E7B better than FW3 FIO-FW3?
TW-E7B has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 22 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LHDC, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 7.3 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
