vs
5.3Battery4.1
3.7Build & features8.8
Why is FW3 FIO-FW3 better than XX HA-XC62T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · XX HA-XC62T: No
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- aptXYes · XX HA-XC62T: No
- LDACYes · XX HA-XC62T: No
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
Why is XX HA-XC62T better than FW3 FIO-FW3?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 4.4 g+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LHDC, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 4.4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
