vs
5.3Battery2.9
3.7Build & features2.1
Why is FW3 FIO-FW3 better than Nearphones HA-NP35T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Nearphones HA-NP35T: No
- Charging time1 h vs 2.5 h2.5×
- aptXYes · Nearphones HA-NP35T: No
- LDACYes · Nearphones HA-NP35T: No
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 12 g2×
Why is Nearphones HA-NP35T better than FW3 FIO-FW3?
- Driver size10 mm vs 16 mm+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 16 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 17 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LHDC, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 12 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
