4.1Battery2.2
Why is FW1 FIO-FW1 better than TAT2205?
- Battery life7 h vs 4 h+75%
- aptXYes · TAT2205: No
Why is TAT2205 better than FW1 FIO-FW1?
TAT2205 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Balanced armature | — |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 4 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.3 g | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
