Why is FT3 better than HE-R10D?
- Lowest frequency7 Hz vs 15 Hz2.1×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+14%
Why is HE-R10D better than FT3?
HE-R10D has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 60 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 7 Hz | 15 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 35,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 350 Ω | 60 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 103 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 7 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 391 g | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
