vs
9.7Noise control & calls9.7
5.8Battery8.9
Why is Fairbuds 2 better than Tune Beam 2?
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
- Driver size11 mm vs 10 mm+10%
Why is Tune Beam 2 better than Fairbuds 2?
- Battery life8 h vs 12 h+50%
- Battery life with ANC6 h vs 10 h+67%
- Total with charging case40 h vs 48 h+20%
- Battery capacity45 mAh vs 65 mAh+44%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 6 | 6 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | 10 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | 48 h |
| Battery capacity | 45 mAh | 65 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 2 h | 5 min → 1 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Teufel AIRY SPORTS TWS 2vsFairphone Fairbuds 26.97.0vs
Fairphone Fairbuds 2vsShokz OpenFit Air 27.07.6vs
Fairphone Fairbuds 2vsbeyerdynamic DT 30 IE Professioneller In-Ear-Monitor7.06.5vs
Fairphone Fairbuds 2vsOPPO ENCO CLIP 27.07.1vs
Fairphone Fairbuds 2vsLG xboom Buds Plus by will.i.am7.06.8
vs
JBL Tune Beam 2vsAVIOT TE-A19.69.6