Dimensions
Size comparison
P9M20
| P9 | M20 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 731 mm | 279 mm | +452 mm |
| Width | 220 mm | 170 mm | +50 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 296 mm | −76 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P9 better than M20?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 55 Hz2.8×
Why is M20 better than P9?
- Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5.1+21%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 100 W | — |
| Speaker channels | — | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 55 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 22,000 Hz |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Stereo | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | — |
| Mains powered | No | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB audio | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 12,300 g | — |
| Width | 220 mm | 170 mm |
| Height | 731 mm | 279 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 296 mm |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | — | Yes |
