vs
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
4.1Battery5.6
Why is Style 3 Bluetooth better than WH-CH520?
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
- Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%
Why is WH-CH520 better than Style 3 Bluetooth?
- Battery life25 h vs 50 h2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | 50 h |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 147 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
