How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Style 3 Bluetooth vs TAH2000

Energy Sistem Style 3 Bluetooth vs Philips TAH2000

What Style 3 Bluetooth does better (1) and where TAH2000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Energy Sistem Style 3 Bluetooth
Energy Sistem · 2022Style 3 Bluetooth
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $10
vs
Philips TAH2000
Philips · 2025TAH2000
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $18
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
3.9Battery4.2

Why is Style 3 Bluetooth better than TAH2000?

  1. Battery capacity400 mAh vs 200 mAh2×

Why is TAH2000 better than Style 3 Bluetooth?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 26 h+4%
  2. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH2000Philips TAH2000≈ $184.1
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—123 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h26 h
Battery capacity400 mAh200 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.4
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare